Diamond proportions | Original-Diamonds


Hearts & Arrows Ideal Cut corresponds to Hearts & Arrows

FirescopeDisplays the visual phenomenon that appears in the Worlds finest Ideal round brilliant cut diamonds. A Hearts & Arrows Ideal Cut Diamond is the ultimate, supreme most magnificent cut diamond man can produce; it accounts for less than 1 % of all diamonds cut. . The highest grades of polish and symmetry allow it to reflect more light than the standard American ideal cut.

The phenomenon of the Hearts & Arrows Ideal Cut may be view easily by any body that possesses a proportion or fire scope. Top 1%


Arrows displayed in diamond under firescope Hearts displayed in diamond under firescope Arrows displayed in diamond under firescope Hearts displayed in diamond under firescope Ideal Cut Light Path

Back to list | Close window

American Ideal Cut corresponds to Superb Ideal Cut

57% Table Ideal CutCorresponds to approximately 16% of the top diamond quality based on cut. The range for the proportions as defined by the American Gem society: Table Diameter: 52.4% to 57.5%, Crown Angle: 33.7 degrees to 35.8 degrees, Girdle Thickness: Thin to Slightly Thick (.51% to 2.95%), Pavilion depth percentage: 42.2 % to 43.8%, Culet: (Pointed) None, Very small to Medium, Total Depth: 58.7% to 62.3%.Noting good symmetry and polish. These percentage ranges justify the beauty and quality of the diamond. An Ideal American cut will reflect nearly all light and is truly a top quality, striking and highly prized cut.

AGS Ideal Cut Proportions

Back to list | Close window

International Fine Trade Cut corresponds to Super Fine Cut

63% Table Fine CutCorresponds to approximately 24% of the top diamond quality based on cut. The proportions for International Fine Cut as defined by AGA Accredited Gem Appraisers are set out in the AGA table below. International Fine Trade cut or "Fine Cut "is still with in the range of a well cut diamond, it will reflect most light that enters it and has a healthy beauty. The benefit here starts to become noticeable with price.

Back to list | Close window

American Average Cut or Average Cut corresponds to Classic Cut

Average CutCorresponds to approximately 38% of the usual diamond quality based on cut. The proportions for Average Cut as defined by AGA Accredited Gem Appraisers are set out in the AGA table below. Average cut diamonds are more usual commercial cut trade heavily in the bulk of mass produced jewelry .These diamonds are usually cut for weight .An Average cut diamond will reflect light and is sparkly.

Back to list | Close window

Below Average Cut corresponds to Below Average Cut

Below Average CutCorresponds to all the rest of round brilliant shaped diamonds that fall out side normal specific cutting ranges. The proportions for Average Cut as defined by AGA Accredited Gem Appraisers are set out in the AGA table below. These diamonds are too deep, narrow, shallow or wide and lose most of their brilliance and Fire, the light passes through and leaks out the stone. Some of these stone may have an interest and beauty factor, price should be well below superior diamonds.

Back to list | Close window


Compare Ideal vs Standard Manufacturing

AGA Accredited Gem Appraisers Cut Grading Chart for Round Brilliant Cut

  Hearts & Arrows Ideal Cut American Ideal Cut International Fine Trade Cut US domestic Average Cut Below Average Cut
Cut classes Phenomenon Class 1A Class 1B Class 2A Class 2B Class 3A Class 3B Class 4A Class 4B
Table, %

53%-63% are weght specific in 1A, 1B, 2A grades
<=.49ctOriginal Diamonds <=.49ct <=.49ct <=.49ct all weights all weights all weights all weights all weights
53-57.5Original Diamonds 53-59 59.1-62
52.9-52
62.1-63
51.9-51.5
63.1-64
51.4-51
64.1-67
50.9-50.5
67.1-70
50.4-50
70.1-72
49.9-49
>72
<49
>=.50ctOriginal Diamonds >=.50ct >=.50ct >=.50ct
53-58Original Diamonds 53-58 58.1-60
52.9-52
60.1-63
51.9-51.5
Crown angle, ° 34.3-34.7Original Diamonds 34.3-34.7 34-34.2
34.8-35
32.1-33.9
35.1-35.8
31.6-32
35.9-36.4
31.5-30.1
36.5-37.9
29.6-30
38-39.4
29-29.5
39.5-40.5
<29
>40.5
Crown height, % <=.49ctOriginal Diamonds <=.49ct <=.49ct <=.49ct all weights all weights all weights all weights all weights
14-16.3Original Diamonds 14-16.3 12.8-13.9
or
16.4-16.8
11.6-12.7
or
16.9-17.9
11.1-11.5
or
18.0-18.1
9.6-11
or
18.2-19.3
8.5-9.5
or
19.4-20.5
7.8-8.4
or
20.6-21.8
<7.8
or
>21.8
>=.50ctOriginal Diamonds >=.50ct >=.50ct >=.50ct
14.3-16.3Original Diamonds 14.3-16.3 13.5-14.2
or
16.4-16.8
11.6-13.4
or
16.9-17.9
Pavilion Depth, % 42.8-43.2Original Diamonds 42.8-43.2 42.5-42.7
43.3-43.5
42-42.4
43.6-44
41.5-49
44.1-44.9
41-41.4
45-45.5
40.5-40.9
45.6-46
38-40.4
46.1-48
<38
>48
Girdle Thikness, %

Word description and percentages
Thin, Medium, Slightly thick
1.7-3Original Diamonds
Slightly thin to slightly thick
1.5-4.5
Thin to slightly thick
1-4.5
Thin to thick
1-5.5
Very thin to very thick
0.4-7
Extra thin to extra thick
0-7
Total Depth, %

Determined by factors already considered above
58.7-62.3Original Diamonds 58.7-62.3 58.3-58.69
62.31-62.99
57.9-58.29
63-63.5
57.5-57.89
63.51-63.8
57-57.46
63.81-64.1
56.5-56.99
64.11-65
55-56.49
65.1-67
<55
>67
Polish/Symmetry ExcellentOriginal Diamonds Excellent or Very Good Excellent to Good Good or Fair Poor

Back to list | Close window

Princess Diamond Proportions Cut Chart

  Ideal Cut Premium Cut International Fine Trade Cut US domestic Average Cut Below Average Cut
Cut classes Class 1A Class 1B Class 2A Class 2B Class 3A Class 3B Class 4A Class 4B
Table, % 62-68Original Diamonds 68.1-71Original Diamonds
61.9-60
71.1-72
59.9-59.0
72.1-77.0
58.9-58
77.1-82.0
57.9-56.0
82.1-85.0
55.9-53.0
85.1-88.0
52.9-50.0
> 88.0
< 50.0
Crown height, % 9-10Original Diamonds 8.9-8.5Original Diamonds
10.1-11
8.4-8.0
11.1-11.5
7.9-6.0
11.6-13.0
5.9-5.0
13.1-15.0
4.9-4.0
15.1-17.5
3.9-3.1
17.6-18.5
<3
>18.5
Girdle Thikness, %

Word description and percentages
Thin to Medium or Medium to Thick 1% to 3.0% or 1.7% to 5.5%Original Diamonds Thin to Thick 1% to 5.5% > more variance Very thin to Very thick 0.4% to 7.0% Extremely thin to Extremely thick 0% to > 7.0%
Total Depth, %

Determined by factors already considered above
64-75Original Diamonds 75.1-80.0
63.9-58.0
80.1-83.0
57.9-57.0
83.1-84.0
56.9-56.0
84.1-85.0
55.9-53.0
>85
<53
Polish/Symmetry Excellent to Good Good or Fair Poor
Square range
Length/Width ratios (Preferences only)
0.95-1.05Original Diamonds
Rectangular range
Length/Width ratios (Preferences only)
1.5-1.75Original Diamonds 1.49-1.06
1.76-1.99
> Class 3 <
Class 3

Back to list | Close window

Pear, Heart, Oval, Marquise Diamond Proportions Chart

  Ideal Cut Premium Cut International Fine Trade Cut US domestic Average Cut Below Average Cut
Cut classes Class 1A Class 1B Class 2A Class 2B Class 3A Class 3B Class 4A Class 4B
Table, % 57-60Original Diamonds 60.1-61.5Original Diamonds
56.9-54
61.6-62
53.9-53
62.1-64.0
52.9-52
64.1-67.0
51.9-51.0
67.1-70.0
50.9-50
70.1-72.0
49.9-49
>72.0
<49.0
Crown height, % 13-14.5Original Diamonds 12.9-12.5Original Diamonds
14.6-15
12.4-12
15.1-15.6
11.9-11.1
15.7-16.5
11.0-9.7
16.6-17.3
9.6-8.7
17.4-18.4
8.6-7.8
18.5-19.5
< 7.8
> 19.5
Girdle Thikness, %

Word description and percentages
Thin to Medium or Medium to Thick 1% to 3.0% or 1.7% to 5.5%Original Diamonds Thin to Thick 1% to 5.5% > more variance allowed Very thin to Very thick 0.4% to 7.0% Extremely thin to Extremely thick 0% to > 7.0%
Total Depth, %

Determined by factors already considered above
59.0-63.0Original Diamonds 63.1-65.4
58.9-58.0
65.5-68.5
57.9-56.0
68.6-71.0
55.9-46.0
71.1-73.0
45.9-43.0
> 73.0
< 43.0
Length/Width ratio
Trade Preferences. A matter of personal taste and choice.
Pear 1.50-1.75Original Diamonds
Marquise 1.75-2.25
Heart 0.98-1.02
Oval 1.33-1.66
1.26-1.99
1.51-2.49
1.24-0.91
1.26-1.74
> Class 3 <
Class 3
Polish/Symmetry
Not a primary determining factor
Excellent to GoodOriginal Diamonds Good or Fair Poor

Back to list | Close window

Emerald & Radiant Diamond Proportions Chart

  Ideal Cut Premium Cut International Fine Trade Cut US domestic Average Cut Below Average Cut
Cut classes Class 1A Class 1B Class 2A Class 2B Class 3A Class 3B Class 4A Class 4B
Table, % 61-63.5Original Diamonds 63.6-64.1Original Diamonds
60.9-60
64.2-65.0
59.9-59.0
65.1-69.0
58.9-58
69.1-74.0
57.9-56.0
74.1-76.0
55.9-53.0
76.1-78.0
52.9-50.0
> 78.0
< 50.0
Crown height, % 12.3-14.4Original Diamonds 12.2-11.9Original Diamonds
14.5-15
11.8-11.5
15.1-15.5
11.4-11.1
15.6-16.2
11.0-9.5
16.3-17.0
9.4-8.5
17.1-18.5
8.4-7.8
18.6-19.5
< 7.8%
> 19.5
Girdle Thikness, %

Word description and percentages
Thin to Medium or Medium to Thick 1% to 3.0% or 1.7% to 5.5%Original Diamonds Thin to Thick 1% to 5.5% > more variance Very thin to Very thick 0.4% to 7.0% Extremely thin to Extremely thick 0% to > 7.0%
Total Depth, %

Determined by factors already considered above
60-65Original Diamonds 65.1-69.0
59.9-58.0
69.1-74.0
57.9-57.0
74.1-78.0
56.9-56.0
78.1-80.0
55.9-53.0
> 80.0%
< 53.0%
Polish/Symmetry
Not a primary determining factor
Excellent to GoodOriginal Diamonds Good or Fair Poor
Square range
Length/Width ratios (Preferences only)
0.95-1.05Original Diamonds
Rectangular range
Length/Width ratios (Preferences only)
1.5-1.75Original Diamonds 1.49-1.26
1.76-1.99
> Class 3 <
Class 3

Information courtesy of D.S. Atlas, Accredited Gem Appraisers, © AGA 1998-2002

Back to list | Close window

Marcel Tolkowsky

Marcel Tolkowsky was a Belgium diamond cutter, In 1919 he publicized his determinations for the most attractive and balanced cut for round brilliant diamonds, his proportions where based on experience, maximum beauty, collected opinion and mathematical calculation, this set the industry standard for many years, Marcel could be described as the father of the Modern Brilliant cut.

Tolkowsky DiamondHis proportions for cutting were followed and approximated for many years.

Diamonds are some times improperly called Tolkowsky cuts when their proportions range only approximates that of the exact proportions determined by Tolkowsky.

These proportions are

Now with increased desire for perfection and with greater beauty the Hearts and Arrows Ideal Cut Diamond was created too even more exacting proportions of balance and beauty , remembering that only an exact small changeable ratio of proportions creates this Phenomenon of the Hearts and Arrows effect.

The American Gem Society or AGS has laid down their determination Ranges for Ideal Brilliant Cut Diamonds. The Tables are as follows:

Back to list | Close window

AGS Proportions Charts for Brilliant Cut

Average Pavilion Depth, % AGS Grade Average Table Diameter, % AGS Grade Crown Angle in degrees AGS Grade
39,4 and less 10 46.3 and smaller 10 28.3 and less 10
39.5-40.1 9 46.4-47.3 9 28.4-29.1 9
40.2-40.6 8 47.4-48.3 8 29.2-29.6 8
40.7-41.1 7 48.4-49.3 7 29.7-30.1 7
41.2-41.6 5 49.4-50.3 7 30.2-30.6 6
41.7-42.1 3 50.4-51.3 3 30.7-31.1 5
42.2-43.8 1Original Diamonds 51.4-52.3 1Original Diamonds 31.2-31.6 4
43.9-44.3 0Original Diamonds 52.4-57.5 0Original Diamonds 31.7-32.1 3
44.4-44.8 1Original Diamonds 57.6-59.5 1Original Diamonds 32.2-32.6 2Original Diamonds
44.9-45.3 3 59.6-62.0 2Original Diamonds 32.7-33.6 1Original Diamonds
45.4-45.8 4 62.1-63.5 3 33.7-35.8 0Original Diamonds
45.9-46.3 5 63.6-65.5 4 35.9-36.3 1Original Diamonds
46.4-46.8 7 65.6-67.5 5 36.4-36.8 2Original Diamonds
46.9-47.5 8 67.6-69.5 6 36.9-37.3 3
47.6-48.5 9 69.6-71.5 7 37.4-37.8 4
48.6+ 10 71.6-73.5 8 37.9-38.3 5
    73.6-75.5 9 38.4-38.8 6
    75.6+ 10 38.9-39.3 7
       10 39.4-39.8 8
       10 39.9 and greater 9, 10


Polish and Symmetry Characteristics AGS Grade Girdle Thikness AGS Grade Culet Size AGS Grade
Extremely Difficult 10x 0Original Diamonds Extremely Thin 3 None, Very small 0Original Diamonds
Very Difficult 10x 1Original Diamonds Very Thin 1Original Diamonds Small, Medium, Slightly Large 1Original Diamonds
Difficult 10x 2Original Diamonds Thin, Medium 0Original Diamonds Large 3
Easy 10x 3 Slightly Thick, Thick 2Original Diamonds Very Large 5
Very Easy 10x 4 Very Thick 5 Extremely Large 7-10
Obvious 10x 5 Extremely Thick 7-10    
Unaided Eye 6        
Easy Unaided Eye 7, 8        
Obvious Unaided Eye 9, 10        

Back to list | Close window

All rights reserved copyright for Original (tm) 2001-2003 ©
Intellectual property right 2002 © ®